대광고 내신 공통영어2 · 범위 복습 우선순위 5문항 · 모의고사형

A conservation team cannot survey every part of a large forest each week. It chooses several observation sites, including wet ground, exposed ridges, and areas affected by recent fires. The aim is not to select the easiest paths or the most beautiful places. It is to include conditions likely to reveal different changes. A report from these sites can warn the team where to investigate more closely, but it should not be described as a complete count of the forest. Sampling creates useful knowledge by making a large task manageable; it also leaves an obligation to explain what was not observed. The quality of a small survey depends less on how confidently its results are announced than on whether the selection fits its purpose and its limits remain visible to those using it.

A conservation team cannot survey every part of a large forest each week. It chooses several observation sites, including wet ground, exposed ridges, and areas affected by recent fires. The aim is not to select the easiest paths or the most beautiful places. It is to include conditions likely to reveal different changes. A report from these sites can warn the team where to investigate more closely, but it should not be described as a complete count of the forest. Sampling creates useful knowledge by making a large task manageable; it also leaves an obligation to explain what was not observed. The quality of a small survey depends less on how confidently its results are announced than on whether the selection fits its purpose and its limits remain visible to those using it.

A conservation team cannot survey every part of a large forest each week. It chooses several observation sites, including wet ground, exposed ridges, and areas affected by recent fires. The aim is not to select the easiest paths or the most beautiful places. It is to include conditions likely to reveal different changes. A report from these sites can warn the team where to investigate more closely, but it should not be described as a complete count of the forest. Sampling creates useful knowledge by making a large task manageable; it also leaves an obligation to explain what was not observed. The quality of a small survey depends less on how confidently its results are announced than on whether the selection fits its purpose and its limits remain visible to those using it.

A conservation team cannot survey every part of a large forest each week. It chooses several observation sites, including wet ground, exposed ridges, and areas affected by recent fires. The aim is not to select the easiest paths or the most beautiful places. It is to include conditions likely to reveal different changes. A report from these sites can warn the team where to investigate more closely, but it should not be described as a complete count of the forest. Sampling creates useful knowledge by making a large task manageable; it also leaves an obligation to explain what was not observed. The quality of a small survey depends less on how confidently its results are announced than on whether the selection fits its purpose and its limits remain visible to those using it.

A conservation team cannot survey every part of a large forest each week. It chooses several observation sites, including wet ground, exposed ridges, and areas affected by recent fires. The aim is not to select the easiest paths or the most beautiful places. It is to include conditions likely to reveal different changes. A report from these sites can warn the team where to investigate more closely, but it should not be described as a complete count of the forest. Sampling creates useful knowledge by making a large task manageable; it also leaves an obligation to explain what was not observed. The quality of a small survey depends less on how confidently its results are announced than on whether the selection fits its purpose and its limits remain visible to those using it.