대광고 영어 · 양보절 사실과 주장 경계 5문항 · 모의고사형

A small cinema acknowledges that streaming services give viewers convenient access to many films. Its manager does not dispute that advantage. She argues, however, that a cinema offers a shared occasion in which attention is less easily divided among household tasks. This does not mean that every cinema audience is attentive or that watching at home has no social value. The distinction concerns what each setting tends to make easier. By admitting the rival service's strength, the manager can identify the narrower basis of her own case rather than pretending that convenience belongs only to cinemas. A concession need not surrender the central argument. It can remove an exaggerated claim and leave a more precise one standing. The persuasive question then becomes whether that remaining difference matters to the audience being addressed.

A small cinema acknowledges that streaming services give viewers convenient access to many films. Its manager does not dispute that advantage. She argues, however, that a cinema offers a shared occasion in which attention is less easily divided among household tasks. This does not mean that every cinema audience is attentive or that watching at home has no social value. The distinction concerns what each setting tends to make easier. By admitting the rival service's strength, the manager can identify the narrower basis of her own case rather than pretending that convenience belongs only to cinemas. A concession need not surrender the central argument. It can remove an exaggerated claim and leave a more precise one standing. The persuasive question then becomes whether that remaining difference matters to the audience being addressed.

A small cinema acknowledges that streaming services give viewers convenient access to many films. Its manager does not dispute that advantage. She argues, however, that a cinema offers a shared occasion in which attention is less easily divided among household tasks. This does not mean that every cinema audience is attentive or that watching at home has no social value. The distinction concerns what each setting tends to make easier. By admitting the rival service's strength, the manager can identify the narrower basis of her own case rather than pretending that convenience belongs only to cinemas. A concession need not surrender the central argument. It can remove an exaggerated claim and leave a more precise one standing. The persuasive question then becomes whether that remaining difference matters to the audience being addressed.

A small cinema acknowledges that streaming services give viewers convenient access to many films. Its manager does not dispute that advantage. She argues, however, that a cinema offers a shared occasion in which attention is less easily divided among household tasks. This does not mean that every cinema audience is attentive or that watching at home has no social value. The distinction concerns what each setting tends to make easier. By admitting the rival service's strength, the manager can identify the narrower basis of her own case rather than pretending that convenience belongs only to cinemas. A concession need not surrender the central argument. It can remove an exaggerated claim and leave a more precise one standing. The persuasive question then becomes whether that remaining difference matters to the audience being addressed.

A small cinema acknowledges that streaming services give viewers convenient access to many films. Its manager does not dispute that advantage. She argues, however, that a cinema offers a shared occasion in which attention is less easily divided among household tasks. This does not mean that every cinema audience is attentive or that watching at home has no social value. The distinction concerns what each setting tends to make easier. By admitting the rival service's strength, the manager can identify the narrower basis of her own case rather than pretending that convenience belongs only to cinemas. A concession need not surrender the central argument. It can remove an exaggerated claim and leave a more precise one standing. The persuasive question then becomes whether that remaining difference matters to the audience being addressed.