수능 영어 기초 · 근거 회수 5문항

A conservation group monitored nesting birds on two islands. On one island, volunteers visited nests every day; on the other, cameras recorded activity and volunteers visited once a week. More chicks survived on the camera-monitored island, but the islands also differed in vegetation and predator numbers. The group reported the survival pattern without claiming that fewer visits were the sole cause. Readers were asked to locate three pieces of evidence: the observed difference, the competing conditions, and the limit placed on the conclusion. A reader who found only the survival numbers tended to choose options that overstated cause. A reader who found only the limitations sometimes missed that a meaningful pattern had still been observed. Accurate understanding required recovering both the finding and its boundary. The group planned a later study with more closely matched islands, but the first report remained useful because it defined what was known and what still needed testing.

A conservation group monitored nesting birds on two islands. On one island, volunteers visited nests every day; on the other, cameras recorded activity and volunteers visited once a week. More chicks survived on the camera-monitored island, but the islands also differed in vegetation and predator numbers. The group reported the survival pattern without claiming that fewer visits were the sole cause. Readers were asked to locate three pieces of evidence: the observed difference, the competing conditions, and the limit placed on the conclusion. A reader who found only the survival numbers tended to choose options that overstated cause. A reader who found only the limitations sometimes missed that a meaningful pattern had still been observed. Accurate understanding required recovering both the finding and its boundary. The group planned a later study with more closely matched islands, but the first report remained useful because it defined what was known and what still needed testing.

A conservation group monitored nesting birds on two islands. On one island, volunteers visited nests every day; on the other, cameras recorded activity and volunteers visited once a week. More chicks survived on the camera-monitored island, but the islands also differed in vegetation and predator numbers. The group reported the survival pattern without claiming that fewer visits were the sole cause. Readers were asked to locate three pieces of evidence: the observed difference, the competing conditions, and the limit placed on the conclusion. A reader who found only the survival numbers tended to choose options that overstated cause. A reader who found only the limitations sometimes missed that a meaningful pattern had still been observed. Accurate understanding required recovering both the finding and its boundary. The group planned a later study with more closely matched islands, but the first report remained useful because it defined what was known and what still needed testing.

A conservation group monitored nesting birds on two islands. On one island, volunteers visited nests every day; on the other, cameras recorded activity and volunteers visited once a week. More chicks survived on the camera-monitored island, but the islands also differed in vegetation and predator numbers. The group reported the survival pattern without claiming that fewer visits were the sole cause. Readers were asked to locate three pieces of evidence: the observed difference, the competing conditions, and the limit placed on the conclusion. A reader who found only the survival numbers tended to choose options that overstated cause. A reader who found only the limitations sometimes missed that a meaningful pattern had still been observed. Accurate understanding required recovering both the finding and its boundary. The group planned a later study with more closely matched islands, but the first report remained useful because it defined what was known and what still needed testing.

A conservation group monitored nesting birds on two islands. On one island, volunteers visited nests every day; on the other, cameras recorded activity and volunteers visited once a week. More chicks survived on the camera-monitored island, but the islands also differed in vegetation and predator numbers. The group reported the survival pattern without claiming that fewer visits were the sole cause. Readers were asked to locate three pieces of evidence: the observed difference, the competing conditions, and the limit placed on the conclusion. A reader who found only the survival numbers tended to choose options that overstated cause. A reader who found only the limitations sometimes missed that a meaningful pattern had still been observed. Accurate understanding required recovering both the finding and its boundary. The group planned a later study with more closely matched islands, but the first report remained useful because it defined what was known and what still needed testing.