← 미니 문제 목록

고3 수능 영어 · 근거 범위 진단 5문항

관찰된 패턴과 단일 원인 주장을 구분하고 연구 조건·한계를 함께 판단하는 창작 수능 기초 세트입니다.

← 읽던 개념 글로 돌아가기
선택 0 / 5

1. 윗글의 제목으로 가장 적절한 것은?

연습 배점 4점 · 난이도 중

제목

Researchers studying summer heat compared pairs of city streets. Each pair had similar traffic levels and building heights, but one street had mature trees while the other had recently planted trees. Sensors recorded air temperature and surface temperature at the same times for four weeks. When one sensor began drifting, its readings were stored separately until a replacement had been checked against a reference device. The tree-lined streets were usually cooler in the afternoon, yet the researchers did not claim that tree age alone explained every difference. Street width, shade from buildings, and watering schedules still varied. They therefore reported the observed pattern and listed the remaining factors instead of presenting a single cause. A later study would compare streets with more closely matched widths and watering. The first study was valuable because it showed where the pattern appeared and where uncertainty remained. Careful limits did not weaken the finding; they identified what the evidence could support and what required another test.

2. 윗글의 내용과 일치하는 것은?

연습 배점 4점 · 난이도 하

내용 일치

Researchers studying summer heat compared pairs of city streets. Each pair had similar traffic levels and building heights, but one street had mature trees while the other had recently planted trees. Sensors recorded air temperature and surface temperature at the same times for four weeks. When one sensor began drifting, its readings were stored separately until a replacement had been checked against a reference device. The tree-lined streets were usually cooler in the afternoon, yet the researchers did not claim that tree age alone explained every difference. Street width, shade from buildings, and watering schedules still varied. They therefore reported the observed pattern and listed the remaining factors instead of presenting a single cause. A later study would compare streets with more closely matched widths and watering. The first study was valuable because it showed where the pattern appeared and where uncertainty remained. Careful limits did not weaken the finding; they identified what the evidence could support and what required another test.

3. 비슷한 교통량과 건물 높이의 거리끼리 짝지은 이유로 가장 적절한 것은?

연습 배점 4점 · 난이도 중

연구 설계

Researchers studying summer heat compared pairs of city streets. Each pair had similar traffic levels and building heights, but one street had mature trees while the other had recently planted trees. Sensors recorded air temperature and surface temperature at the same times for four weeks. When one sensor began drifting, its readings were stored separately until a replacement had been checked against a reference device. The tree-lined streets were usually cooler in the afternoon, yet the researchers did not claim that tree age alone explained every difference. Street width, shade from buildings, and watering schedules still varied. They therefore reported the observed pattern and listed the remaining factors instead of presenting a single cause. A later study would compare streets with more closely matched widths and watering. The first study was valuable because it showed where the pattern appeared and where uncertainty remained. Careful limits did not weaken the finding; they identified what the evidence could support and what required another test.

4. 연구진의 결론 방식으로 가장 적절한 것은?

연습 배점 4점 · 난이도 상

주장 범위

Researchers studying summer heat compared pairs of city streets. Each pair had similar traffic levels and building heights, but one street had mature trees while the other had recently planted trees. Sensors recorded air temperature and surface temperature at the same times for four weeks. When one sensor began drifting, its readings were stored separately until a replacement had been checked against a reference device. The tree-lined streets were usually cooler in the afternoon, yet the researchers did not claim that tree age alone explained every difference. Street width, shade from buildings, and watering schedules still varied. They therefore reported the observed pattern and listed the remaining factors instead of presenting a single cause. A later study would compare streets with more closely matched widths and watering. The first study was valuable because it showed where the pattern appeared and where uncertainty remained. Careful limits did not weaken the finding; they identified what the evidence could support and what required another test.

5. 가장 타당한 추론은?

연습 배점 4점 · 난이도 수능 이상

복합 추론

Researchers studying summer heat compared pairs of city streets. Each pair had similar traffic levels and building heights, but one street had mature trees while the other had recently planted trees. Sensors recorded air temperature and surface temperature at the same times for four weeks. When one sensor began drifting, its readings were stored separately until a replacement had been checked against a reference device. The tree-lined streets were usually cooler in the afternoon, yet the researchers did not claim that tree age alone explained every difference. Street width, shade from buildings, and watering schedules still varied. They therefore reported the observed pattern and listed the remaining factors instead of presenting a single cause. A later study would compare streets with more closely matched widths and watering. The first study was valuable because it showed where the pattern appeared and where uncertainty remained. Careful limits did not weaken the finding; they identified what the evidence could support and what required another test.

콘텐츠·수업 설계: 최세진 영어 · 베라진(Verajin) · 베라딕트

상담 신청