대광고 영어 내신 · 시험 전 독립 판단 5문항

A student magazine changed the way it checked science articles before publication. In the past, a writer attached a list of sources, and an editor confirmed that each source existed. The new process asks a second student to locate the exact sentence supporting every major claim without using the writer's notes. If the reviewer cannot find it, the claim is either narrowed or removed. Writers may explain why they chose a source, but that explanation does not replace independent checking. After revision, a different editor reads the article with the source list hidden and marks any statement that seems stronger than the evidence. Passing both reviews makes an article eligible for the next issue; it does not guarantee publication because space is limited. The magazine keeps separate records for source submission, evidence verification, and final publication. Its goal is not to distrust writers, but to distinguish a claim that sounds familiar from one that another reader can verify.

A student magazine changed the way it checked science articles before publication. In the past, a writer attached a list of sources, and an editor confirmed that each source existed. The new process asks a second student to locate the exact sentence supporting every major claim without using the writer's notes. If the reviewer cannot find it, the claim is either narrowed or removed. Writers may explain why they chose a source, but that explanation does not replace independent checking. After revision, a different editor reads the article with the source list hidden and marks any statement that seems stronger than the evidence. Passing both reviews makes an article eligible for the next issue; it does not guarantee publication because space is limited. The magazine keeps separate records for source submission, evidence verification, and final publication. Its goal is not to distrust writers, but to distinguish a claim that sounds familiar from one that another reader can verify.

A student magazine changed the way it checked science articles before publication. In the past, a writer attached a list of sources, and an editor confirmed that each source existed. The new process asks a second student to locate the exact sentence supporting every major claim without using the writer's notes. If the reviewer cannot find it, the claim is either narrowed or removed. Writers may explain why they chose a source, but that explanation does not replace independent checking. After revision, a different editor reads the article with the source list hidden and marks any statement that seems stronger than the evidence. Passing both reviews makes an article eligible for the next issue; it does not guarantee publication because space is limited. The magazine keeps separate records for source submission, evidence verification, and final publication. Its goal is not to distrust writers, but to distinguish a claim that sounds familiar from one that another reader can verify.

A student magazine changed the way it checked science articles before publication. In the past, a writer attached a list of sources, and an editor confirmed that each source existed. The new process asks a second student to locate the exact sentence supporting every major claim without using the writer's notes. If the reviewer cannot find it, the claim is either narrowed or removed. Writers may explain why they chose a source, but that explanation does not replace independent checking. After revision, a different editor reads the article with the source list hidden and marks any statement that seems stronger than the evidence. Passing both reviews makes an article eligible for the next issue; it does not guarantee publication because space is limited. The magazine keeps separate records for source submission, evidence verification, and final publication. Its goal is not to distrust writers, but to distinguish a claim that sounds familiar from one that another reader can verify.

A student magazine changed the way it checked science articles before publication. In the past, a writer attached a list of sources, and an editor confirmed that each source existed. The new process asks a second student to locate the exact sentence supporting every major claim without using the writer's notes. If the reviewer cannot find it, the claim is either narrowed or removed. Writers may explain why they chose a source, but that explanation does not replace independent checking. After revision, a different editor reads the article with the source list hidden and marks any statement that seems stronger than the evidence. Passing both reviews makes an article eligible for the next issue; it does not guarantee publication because space is limited. The magazine keeps separate records for source submission, evidence verification, and final publication. Its goal is not to distrust writers, but to distinguish a claim that sounds familiar from one that another reader can verify.