대광고 영어 · 주장·근거·조건 5문항

A museum introduced quiet hours for visitors who preferred a less crowded environment. Attendance during those hours increased over three months. Interviews suggested that some visitors came because noise was reduced, while others came because the quiet hours were scheduled in the morning. The museum reported that the program was useful for several groups, but it did not describe lower noise as the only reason for the increase. It also noted that families with young children usually visited later in the day. The next survey would compare visitors at the same time on days with and without the program. The report’s main claim depended on three parts: attendance rose, visitors gave more than one reason, and the pattern did not apply equally to every group. Removing the last two parts would make the conclusion simpler but less accurate.

A museum introduced quiet hours for visitors who preferred a less crowded environment. Attendance during those hours increased over three months. Interviews suggested that some visitors came because noise was reduced, while others came because the quiet hours were scheduled in the morning. The museum reported that the program was useful for several groups, but it did not describe lower noise as the only reason for the increase. It also noted that families with young children usually visited later in the day. The next survey would compare visitors at the same time on days with and without the program. The report’s main claim depended on three parts: attendance rose, visitors gave more than one reason, and the pattern did not apply equally to every group. Removing the last two parts would make the conclusion simpler but less accurate.

A museum introduced quiet hours for visitors who preferred a less crowded environment. Attendance during those hours increased over three months. Interviews suggested that some visitors came because noise was reduced, while others came because the quiet hours were scheduled in the morning. The museum reported that the program was useful for several groups, but it did not describe lower noise as the only reason for the increase. It also noted that families with young children usually visited later in the day. The next survey would compare visitors at the same time on days with and without the program. The report’s main claim depended on three parts: attendance rose, visitors gave more than one reason, and the pattern did not apply equally to every group. Removing the last two parts would make the conclusion simpler but less accurate.

A museum introduced quiet hours for visitors who preferred a less crowded environment. Attendance during those hours increased over three months. Interviews suggested that some visitors came because noise was reduced, while others came because the quiet hours were scheduled in the morning. The museum reported that the program was useful for several groups, but it did not describe lower noise as the only reason for the increase. It also noted that families with young children usually visited later in the day. The next survey would compare visitors at the same time on days with and without the program. The report’s main claim depended on three parts: attendance rose, visitors gave more than one reason, and the pattern did not apply equally to every group. Removing the last two parts would make the conclusion simpler but less accurate.

A museum introduced quiet hours for visitors who preferred a less crowded environment. Attendance during those hours increased over three months. Interviews suggested that some visitors came because noise was reduced, while others came because the quiet hours were scheduled in the morning. The museum reported that the program was useful for several groups, but it did not describe lower noise as the only reason for the increase. It also noted that families with young children usually visited later in the day. The next survey would compare visitors at the same time on days with and without the program. The report’s main claim depended on three parts: attendance rose, visitors gave more than one reason, and the pattern did not apply equally to every group. Removing the last two parts would make the conclusion simpler but less accurate.