대광고 1학년 2학기 중간고사 · 결합·문장 변형·논리 방향 · 모의고사형

When a coastal town introduced a deposit on reusable food containers, shop owners feared that customers would regard it as a price increase. The town therefore described the payment as money temporarily held, not as a fee for the meal. Customers could recover the full deposit at any participating shop, including one where they had bought nothing. This arrangement reduced the effort required to return a container. It also meant that a shop might receive more containers than it had issued. A shared collection service handled that imbalance each evening. During the first month, returns were frequent, but the organizers did not attribute them to environmental concern alone. Convenient return points and the refundable payment offered separate reasons to participate. The policy worked by connecting an individual incentive to a collective system; neither the moral message nor the payment by itself describes the whole arrangement.

When a coastal town introduced a deposit on reusable food containers, shop owners feared that customers would regard it as a price increase. The town therefore described the payment as money temporarily held, not as a fee for the meal. Customers could recover the full deposit at any participating shop, including one where they had bought nothing. This arrangement reduced the effort required to return a container. It also meant that a shop might receive more containers than it had issued. A shared collection service handled that imbalance each evening. During the first month, returns were frequent, but the organizers did not attribute them to environmental concern alone. Convenient return points and the refundable payment offered separate reasons to participate. The policy worked by connecting an individual incentive to a collective system; neither the moral message nor the payment by itself describes the whole arrangement.

When a coastal town introduced a deposit on reusable food containers, shop owners feared that customers would regard it as a price increase. The town therefore described the payment as money temporarily held, not as a fee for the meal. Customers could recover the full deposit at any participating shop, including one where they had bought nothing. This arrangement reduced the effort required to return a container. It also meant that a shop might receive more containers than it had issued. A shared collection service handled that imbalance each evening. During the first month, returns were frequent, but the organizers did not attribute them to environmental concern alone. Convenient return points and the refundable payment offered separate reasons to participate. The policy worked by connecting an individual incentive to a collective system; neither the moral message nor the payment by itself describes the whole arrangement.

When a coastal town introduced a deposit on reusable food containers, shop owners feared that customers would regard it as a price increase. The town therefore described the payment as money temporarily held, not as a fee for the meal. Customers could recover the full deposit at any participating shop, including one where they had bought nothing. This arrangement reduced the effort required to return a container. It also meant that a shop might receive more containers than it had issued. A shared collection service handled that imbalance each evening. During the first month, returns were frequent, but the organizers did not attribute them to environmental concern alone. Convenient return points and the refundable payment offered separate reasons to participate. The policy worked by connecting an individual incentive to a collective system; neither the moral message nor the payment by itself describes the whole arrangement.

When a coastal town introduced a deposit on reusable food containers, shop owners feared that customers would regard it as a price increase. The town therefore described the payment as money temporarily held, not as a fee for the meal. Customers could recover the full deposit at any participating shop, including one where they had bought nothing. This arrangement reduced the effort required to return a container. It also meant that a shop might receive more containers than it had issued. A shared collection service handled that imbalance each evening. During the first month, returns were frequent, but the organizers did not attribute them to environmental concern alone. Convenient return points and the refundable payment offered separate reasons to participate. The policy worked by connecting an individual incentive to a collective system; neither the moral message nor the payment by itself describes the whole arrangement.